Acute rhabdomyolysis with severe polymyositis following ipilimumab-nivolumab treatment in a cancer patient with elevated anti-striated muscle antibody
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 10 March 2016
Accepted: 23 May 2016
Published: 21 June 2016
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy since these drugs target inhibitory pathways on T cells, which result in durable anti-tumor immune responses and significant overall survival for a subset of cancer patients. These drugs can also lead to toxicities, which require additional research to identify mechanisms of toxicities and biomarkers that can help to identify patients who will develop immune-related adverse events.
We describe the first case, to our knowledge, of a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who developed acute rhabdomyolysis with severe polymyositis after treatment with combination immunotherapy consisting of ipilimumab plus nivolumab (Trial registration: NCT01928394. Registered: 8/21/2013). We found that this patient had an elevated pre-existing anti-striated muscle antibody titer, which was likely exacerbated with the immunotherapy treatment thereby resulting in the presentation of acute rhabdomyolysis and severe polymyositis.
This case suggests that immune-related adverse events may be linked to subclinical autoimmune conditions which highlights the need for additional studies to identify patients who are at risk for toxicities.
Advances in our understanding of immune checkpoints have led to the development of novel approaches for cancer therapy. Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody that directly inhibits the function of the immune checkpoint cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and it was shown to improve survival, which led to approval in treatment of patients with melanoma [1, 2]. Nivolumab targets the programmed death-1 checkpoint and was approved as treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma [3–5]. Recently, combination therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was shown to improve progression free survival, which led to approval of this combination as treatment for patients with metastatic melanoma .
Although immune checkpoint therapies can lead to significant clinical benefit, they are also associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As increasing numbers of these immunomodulatory treatments are under investigation, clinicians need to become familiar with diagnosing and controlling irAEs. More importantly, immunologic mechanisms and biomarkers that can help to identify patients at risk for irAEs with immune checkpoint therapy are critical to help clinicians select appropriate patients for treatment. We describe here the first case, to our knowledge, of a patient with metastatic papillary transitional cell carcinoma after three prior chemotherapy regimens, in whom acute rhabdomyolysis with severe polymyositis developed on a clinical trial of ipilimumab plus nivolumab. We retrospectively identified an elevated pre-existing anti-striated muscle antibody titer (anti-SM-titer), which provides a potential immunologic mechanism and biomarker for patients at risk for rhabdomyolysis and polymyositis with immune checkpoint therapy.
The patient, a 73-year-old Chinese man, with no significant past medical history, presented with hematuria and was initially treated with a left nephroureterectomy in May 2009. The pathology report showed a papillary transitional cell carcinoma in the renal pelvis measuring 2.6 cm with evidence of lymphovascular invasion. At that time, the patient did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and did well until October 2010.
In October 2010, the patient underwent staging workup which revealed multiple pulmonary metastases. He received 7 cycles of gemcitabine combined with carboplatin. Initially, he experienced response to treatment. However, there were residual pulmonary nodules and these were noted to be stable in repeat restaging study.
In September 2011, the patient sought evaluation at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center for further care. Due to residual pulmonary nodules, he received 2 courses of dose-dense MVAC (Methotrexate 30 mg/m2, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2, vinblastine 3 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2) without further improvement of the residual lung nodules. After this, he was followed closely without further treatment.
In July 2013, he presented with dysuria. He underwent cystoscopy which confirmed tumor involvement in the bladder. In August 2013, he underwent a radical cystoprostatectomy. Pathology revealed a stage 4a urothelial carcinoma with invasion into the prostatic stroma, surgical margins were negative, and none of the lymph nodes were involved by metastatic disease. He received 3 cycles of chemotherapy consisting of dose-dense MVAC, which was completed in November 2013. After this, he was followed closely without further treatment.
In August 2014, he presented with progressive metastatic disease including new right external iliac lymphadenopathy and increase in size of pulmonary nodules. He received 3 cycles of pemetrexed every 3 weeks (500 mg/m2) with no detectable change in the size of measurable disease.
In November 2014, the patient agreed to participate in a randomized phase 1/2, open-label study of nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab combined with ipilimumab (approved by the Institutional Review Board). He was randomly assigned to receive treatment with nivolumab (3 mg/kg) combined with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. He received the first treatment on November 14, 2014, which was well-tolerated with no immediate adverse effects. On December 4, 2014, he received his second treatment. At that time, he reported mild throat discomfort and tightness in his jaw when he swallowed; the etiology of these symptoms was unclear and not thought to be related to the immunotherapy agents. The patient denied any skin rash, diarrhea, or abdominal pain. His blood test results were within normal limits, except for an asymptomatic alanine transaminase (ALT) level of 157 IU/L and an aspartate transaminase level (AST) of 703 IU/L, which was a grade 3 adverse event per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4 (CTCAE). Since the patient did not have any clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain or nausea/vomiting associated with elevated liver function test (LFTs), a plan of close observation without changes in treatment was instituted as per the guideline of clinical trial protocol.
On December 8, 2014, the patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of significant lower back pain, profound weakness including inability to ambulate, and difficulty opening his mouth, eating, and speaking. On physical examination, the patient was noted to have bilateral ptosis and extraocular muscle weakness. His vital signs were stable. Laboratory tests showed creatine kinase (CK) level of 13,710 U/L (reference range; 55–170, CTCAE grade 4), AST level of 1346 IU/L (reference range; 15–46, CTCAE grade 4), ALT level of 378 IU/L (reference range;7–56, CTCAE grade 3), CK-MB level of 149.1 ng/mL (reference range; 0.6–6.3), creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL (reference range; 0.7–1.3), blood urea nitrogen level of 43 mg/dL, troponin I level of 7.98 ng/mL (reference range; <0.03), alkaline phosphatase level of 44 U/L (reference range; 38–126), lactate dehydrogenase level of 3697 IU/L (reference range; 313–618), and the presence of myoglobinuria. An electrocardiogram was unremarkable. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit for further care and subsequently diagnosed with acute rhabdomyolysis associated with severe polymyositis, which were suspected to be immune-related toxicities. He received intravenous fluids and methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg twice daily).
On December 12, 2014, a paraneoplastic antibody panel was negative with the exception of elevated anti-SM-titer (1:61440 [normal ≤ 1:120]). The presence of elevated anti-SM-titer provided a potential immunologic mechanism for the patient’s presentation with rhabdomyolysis and polymyositis. We had not previously checked an anti-SM-titer prior to treatment but, we had a pre-treatment blood sample and used it to retrospectively evaluate the patient’s pre-treatment anti-SM-titer. We found the patient’s pre-treatment anti-SM-titer was already elevated at 1:15360. In retrospect, it appears that this patient had an underlying autoimmune disorder that was exacerbated by treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab immunotherapy.
The patient ultimately received 2 doses of intravenous immunoglobulin, which was completed in December 2014, and 12 rounds of plasmapheresis, which completed in February 2015. These treatments resulted in improvement of his antibody titer and other laboratory tests (Fig. 1). The patient’s muscle strength improved and tracheostomy was performed in December 2014 to provide intermittent respiratory support while the patient was participating in physical therapy rehabilitation. Unfortunately, on March 2015, imaging studies showed progressive disease and the patient was referred to hospice care where he died in April 2015.
Immune checkpoint therapies have demonstrated high response rates and prolonged overall survival in cancer patients; however, these therapies require education to recognize and treat related toxicities [4, 5, 7–9]. The most common reported grade 3–4 adverse events in combination therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab were gastrointestinal, skin and hepatic . Less common reported immune related adverse events include limbic encephalitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, red cell aplasia, and nephritis.
Polymyositis associated with immune checkpoint therapies has been reported before. Hunter et al. described a patient who developed autoimmune inflammatory myopathy after treatment with ipilimumab . Liao et al. reported atypical neurological complications of ipilimumab, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, transverse myelitis, or concurrent myositis and myasthenia gravis–type syndrome . Yoshioka et al. reported a patient who experienced respiratory discomfort 7 weeks after nivolumab infusion . In another case report, authors reported dermatomyositis 2 weeks after the first dose of ipilimumab therapy . Min et al. reported a patient who was treated with anti-PD1 and experienced severe hypothyroidism and rhabdomyolysis . The cases highlight rhabdomyolysis and polymyositis as notable adverse event with immune checkpoint therapy. An underlying immunologic mechanism for these previous reports of rhabdomyolysis and polymyositis has not been established. Here, we propose that immune checkpoint agents may exacerbate underlying autoimmune conditions consisting of elevated preexisting anti-SM-titer, which can elicit rhabdomyolysis and polymyositis.
Here, we describe irAEs that may be linked to subclinical autoimmune conditions with elevated levels of pre-existing anti-SM-titer, which highlights the need for additional studies to identify patients who are at risk for toxicities. Future studies will be needed to determine the prevalence of elevated anti-SM-titer cancer patients and to determine whether these patients are at higher risk of developing rhabdomyolysis and polymyositis with immune checkpoint therapies. We believe that our experience may be informative for treating physicians since immune checkpoint therapies are becoming widely used in oncology.
AE, adverse event; ALT, alanine transaminase; anti-SM-titer, anti-striated muscle antibody titer; AST, aspartate transaminase; CK, creatine kinase; CK-MB, creatinine kinase isoenzyme MB; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4; IPI, ipilimumab; irAEs, immune-related adverse events; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; NIVO, nivolumab; Trach, tracheostomy; ULN, upper limit of normal
We thank Bryan F. Tutt from UT MD Anderson’s Department of Scientific Publications for editing this manuscript. This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through UT MD Anderson’s Cancer Center Support Grant CA016672.
STU, SKS, JG, and PS primarily cared for the patient. MAB wrote the manuscript, which was edited by NMT, SKS, JG and PS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study was approved by the institutional review board of UT MD Anderson Cancer Center. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient prior to participation in the study. We obtained consent to publish this case report from study sponsor (Bristol-Myers Squibb).
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Hodi FS, O'Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):711–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2517–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):320–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, et al. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2006–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(1):23–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, et al. Pembrolizumab versus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2018–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1270–1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hunter G, Voll C, Robinson CA. Autoimmune inflammatory myopathy after treatment with ipilimumab. Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;36(4):518–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liao B, Shroff S, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, et al. Atypical neurological complications of ipilimumab therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16(4):589–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yoshioka M, Kambe N, Yamamoto Y, et al. Case of respiratory discomfort due to myositis after administration of nivolumab. J Dermatol. 2015;42(10):1008–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheik Ali S, Goddard AL, Luke JJ, et al. Drug-associated dermatomyositis following ipilimumab therapy: a novel immune-mediated adverse event associated with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 blockade. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(2):195–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Min L, Hodi FS. Anti-PD1 following ipilimumab for mucosal melanoma: durable tumor response associated with severe hypothyroidism and rhabdomyolysis. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(1):15–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar